At the Spanish Health Economics Association (AES) conference in May 2011, OHE’s Ruth Puig Peiró discussed a recent OHE study that reviewed the available literature on variations in medicines’ efficacy and effectiveness across countries. The desire to use limited health…
At the Spanish Health Economics Association (AES) conference in May 2011, OHE’s Ruth Puig Peiró discussed a recent OHE study that reviewed the available literature on variations in medicines’ efficacy and effectiveness across countries.
The desire to use limited health care resources wisely has driven interest in understanding the relative or comparative effectiveness of medicines. In the Europe Union, discussions continue about whether a pan-European assessment of relative cost-effectiveness is possible and/or desirable. An enduring issue is whether variations among countries are great enough to create important differences in the effectiveness of treatment. Factors include, for example, patients’ characteristics, differences in clinical practice, and other variations at the institutional and national levels that affect both underlying population health and access to care.
At the Spanish Health Economics Association (AES) conference in May 2011, OHE’s Ruth Puig Peiró discussed a recent OHE study that reviewed the available literature on variations in medicines’ efficacy and effectiveness across countries. Considered were clinical trial studies and cost effectiveness studies published in English from 2000 to May 2010. Of the eight studies that qualified, most reported results of relative efficacy from clinical trials, rather than the effectiveness of the treatment in actual clinical practice. A table of the studies is available in the presentation.
The authors note that clinical trials are designed to demonstrate efficacy; they are not intended to tease out differences across countries, but to show overall treatment effects. The underlying assumption is that relative efficacy does not vary substantially from one country to another. Although some such research notes that variations do occur, these rarely are quantified by country.
No studies were found that examine differences in effectiveness across countries – i.e., how well a treatment performs in the real world. The authors suggest that collecting and analysing reliable and comparable registry data would be one means of producing analyses for this purpose, but recognise that this would be a complex and expensive undertaking. Download Puig Peiró, R. Relative effectiveness across Europe: Do Member States diverge in clinical outcomes from treatment? Presentation at the Asociación de Economia de la Salud. Mallorca, Spain. 5 May 2011.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
3rd Party Cookies
This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!